Ursem 1 objective function.
This class defines the Ursem 1 global optimization problem. This is a unimodal minimization problem defined as follows:
with and
.
Two-dimensional Ursem01 function
Global optimum: for
Jamil, M. & Yang, X.-S. A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problems Int. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 2013, 4, 150-194.
Ursem 3 objective function.
This class defines the Ursem 3 global optimization problem. This is a multimodal minimization problem defined as follows:
with ,
.
Two-dimensional Ursem03 function
Global optimum: for
Gavana, A. Global Optimization Benchmarks and AMPGO
Todo
Gavana and Jamil #157 disagree on the formulae here. Jamil squares the x[1] term in the sine expression. Gavana doesn’t. Go with Gavana here.
Ursem 4 objective function.
This class defines the Ursem 4 global optimization problem. This is a multimodal minimization problem defined as follows:
with for
.
Two-dimensional Ursem04 function
Global optimum: for
for
Jamil, M. & Yang, X.-S. A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problems Int. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 2013, 4, 150-194.
Ursem Waves objective function.
This class defines the Ursem Waves global optimization problem. This is a multimodal minimization problem defined as follows:
with ,
.
Two-dimensional UrsemWaves function
Global optimum: for
Jamil, M. & Yang, X.-S. A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problems Int. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 2013, 4, 150-194.
Todo
Jamil #159, has an x_2^2 - 4.5 x_2^2 in the brackets. Why wasn’t this rationalised to -5.5 x_2^2? This makes me wonder if the equation is listed correctly?